import { STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE } from './store-selection.js';
/**
 * The apply workflow instructions, authored once and rendered by both the
 * skill and command surfaces. The surfaces are intentionally distinct, but
 * they differ only in how they are invoked — the generation transformers
 * rewrite the canonical `/opsx:<id>` tokens per surface downstream (see
 * command-references.ts). The instruction text itself is shared, so the two
 * cannot silently drift. Should a surface ever need genuinely different
 * wording, add a parameter here and pass it from that surface's template.
 */
export function getApplyInstructions() {
    return `Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.

${STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE}

**Input**: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., \`/opsx:apply add-auth\`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

**Steps**

1. **Select the change**

   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
   - If ambiguous, run \`openspec list --json\` to get available changes and ask the user to select one

   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., \`/opsx:apply <other>\`).

2. **Check status to understand the schema**
   \`\`\`bash
   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
   \`\`\`
   Parse the JSON to understand:
   - \`schemaName\`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
   - \`planningHome\`, \`changeRoot\`, and \`actionContext\`: planning scope and edit constraints
   - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)

3. **Get apply instructions**

   \`\`\`bash
   openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
   \`\`\`

   This returns:
   - \`contextFiles\`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
   - Progress (total, complete, remaining)
   - Task list with status
   - Dynamic instruction based on current state
   - Optional \`context\`: current required project instruction input from the selected root
   - Optional \`operationGuidance\`: current advisory guidance for apply

   **Handle states:**
   - If \`state: "blocked"\` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using \`/opsx:continue\` (if it is not installed, run \`openspec status --change "<name>" --json\` to see the next artifact and \`openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json\` for how to create it)
   - If \`state: "all_done"\`: congratulate, suggest archive
   - Otherwise: proceed to implementation

   Treat \`context\` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
   apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
   Treat \`operationGuidance\` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
   workflow.

   Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
   progress, \`contextFiles\`, and the built-in \`instruction\`. They are not
   evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
   not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
   instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
   conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
   conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
   These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.

4. **Read context files**

   Read every file path listed under \`contextFiles\` from the apply instructions output.
   The files depend on the schema being used:
   - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
   - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output

   Do not copy \`context\` or \`operationGuidance\` verbatim into implementation
   files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.

5. **Show current progress**

   Display:
   - Schema being used
   - Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
   - Remaining tasks overview
   - Dynamic instruction from CLI

6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**

   For each pending task:
   - Show which task is being worked on
   - Make the code changes required
   - Keep changes minimal and focused
   - Mark task complete in the tasks file: \`- [ ]\` → \`- [x]\`
   - Continue to next task

   **Pause if:**
   - Task is unclear → ask for clarification
   - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
   - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
   - User interrupts

7. **On completion or pause, show status**

   Display:
   - Tasks completed this session
   - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
   - If all done: suggest archive
   - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance

**Output During Implementation**

\`\`\`
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)

Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
\`\`\`

**Output On Completion**

\`\`\`
## Implementation Complete

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓

### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...

All tasks complete! You can archive this change with \`/opsx:archive\`.
\`\`\`

**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**

\`\`\`
## Implementation Paused

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete

### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>

**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach

What would you like to do?
\`\`\`

**Guardrails**
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria

**Fluid Workflow Integration**

This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:

- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly`;
}
export function getApplyChangeSkillTemplate() {
    return {
        name: 'openspec-apply-change',
        description: 'Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.',
        instructions: getApplyInstructions(),
        license: 'MIT',
        compatibility: 'Requires openspec CLI.',
        metadata: { author: 'openspec', version: '1.0' },
    };
}
export function getOpsxApplyCommandTemplate() {
    return {
        name: 'OPSX: Apply',
        description: 'Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)',
        category: 'Workflow',
        tags: ['workflow', 'artifacts', 'experimental'],
        content: getApplyInstructions(),
    };
}
//# sourceMappingURL=apply-change.js.map