{
  "draft": "draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-04",
  "doc_id": "RFC9342",
  "title": "Clustered Alternate-Marking Method",
  "authors": [
    "G. Fioccola, Ed.",
    "M. Cociglio",
    "A. Sapio",
    "R. Sisto",
    "T. Zhou"
  ],
  "format": [
    "XML",
    "TEXT",
    "HTML",
    "PDF"
  ],
  "page_count": "24",
  "pub_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "source": "IP Performance Measurement",
  "abstract": "This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network; this can result in a multipoint-to-multipoint network.  The network clustering approach is presented and, for this reason, the technique described here is called \"Clustered Alternate Marking\".  This document obsoletes RFC 8889.",
  "pub_date": "December 2022",
  "keywords": [
    "Multipoint",
    "Cluster",
    "Performance",
    "Measurement",
    "Monitoring",
    "Passive",
    "Hybrid",
    "Loss",
    "Delay",
    "Delay Variation",
    "Hashing",
    "Closed-Loop"
  ],
  "obsoletes": [
    "RFC8889"
  ],
  "obsoleted_by": [],
  "updates": [],
  "updated_by": [],
  "see_also": [],
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC9342",
  "errata_url": null
}